The article examines the provisions of EU Directive 2004/48 on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights. In particular, the author critically examines the provisions regarding inter alia (i) subjects entitles to ask for remedies, (ii) evidence of infringement (iii) the right of information, (iv) provisional and precautionary measures, (v) measures resulting from a decision on … Continue reading
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.
Tagsair passenger rights Armed Forces Aviation Law biodiversity Blog Carnival Broadcasting Broadcasting and the Internal Market Cambodia carriage of goods by sea climate technologies Commercial law Constitutional Law Copyright Corporate veil Criminal Law Data Protection and Retention Dr Steven Truxal economic rights enforcement EU EU Law European European Law event extraordinary rendition FA Premier League v QC Leisure Football freedom of movement Free speech genetic conservation Himalaya clause human rights ICTLG ILAG immunity Intellectual Property Intellectual Property; patents; EU; enhanced cooperation Intellectual Property Law International Law international trade Internet and Digital Environment ISEL Italy lending rights Libel and Defamation maritime law Media and Communications Law Middle East Montreal Convention Murphy v Media Protection Services News patents PhD plant varieties post-conflict situations Privacy public health remuneration sanctions securities Seminars shipper liability Steven Truxal technology transfer TFEU Tourism trademarks Traditional Media Transport Law TRIPS TRIPS Agreement Uncategorized War WHO WTO